“The Potential of Modern Discourse” in “The Potential Of Modern Discourse”
Adorno, Theodor Wiessengrund. Aesthetische Theorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1970.
——. Negative Dialectics. Trans. E. B. Ashton. New York: Seabury Press, 1973.
——. Philosophie der neuen Musik. Frankfurt: Europaische Verlagsanstalt, 1958.
——. Philosophy of Modern Music. Trans. A. G. Mitchell and Wesley Blomster. New York: Seabury Press, 1973.
Albertson, Elizabeth. “Ratio und Mystik” im Werk Robert Musils. Munich: Nymphenburger Verlag, 1968.
Allemann, Beda. Ironie und Dichtung. Pfullingen: Neske, 1956-1969, pp. 177-220.
Apel, Karl-Otto. “From Kant to Peirce: The Semiotical Transformation of Transcendental Logic.” Proc. from the Third International Kant Congress. Ed. Lewis, White, Beck, 1970.
——. “The Transcendental Conception of Language Communication and the Ideal of a First Philosophy.” In History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics. Ed. Hermann Parret. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1976.
Aristotle. Poetics. Trans, and intr. by G. F. Else. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1967-77.
Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words. Ed. J. O. Urmson. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1962.
Bachmann, Ingeborg. “Zu Robert Musil’s ‘DMoE,’ Ins tausendjaehrige Reich.” Akzente I (1954): 50-53.
Bakhtin, Mikhail. Problèmes de la poétique de Dostoievski. Trans. Guy Verret. Lausanne: Edition l’Age d’Homme, 1929-1970.
Bakhtin, Mikhail, and V. N. Volochinov. Le Marxisme et la philosophie du langage: Essai d’application de la méthode sociologique en linguistique. Trans, and intr. Marina Yaguello. Paris: Minuit, 1977.
Banfield, Ann. “Narrative Style and Indirect Speech.” Foundations of Language: International Journal of Language and Philosophy 10 (1973).
Bange, Pierre. Ironie et dialogisme dans les romans de Fontane. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble, 1974.
Barthes, Roland. “L’Ancienne rhétorique: Aide-mémoire.” Communications 16 (1970): 172-229.
——. “Introduction à l’analyse structurale des récrits.” Communications 8 (1966): 1-27.
——. S/Z. Paris: Seuil, 1970.
Bateston, Gregory. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine Books, 1972.
Bateson, Gregory, and Jurgen Reusch. Communication: The Social Matrix of Psychiatry. New York: W. W. Norton and Co., 1951-1968.
Bauer, Gerhart. “Die Aufloesung des anthropozentrischen Verhaltens im modernen Roman, dargestellt an Musils ‘MoE’,” Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift 42 (1968): 677-701.
Bauer, Sophie, et al. Studien zu Robert Musil. Koeln: Graz, 1966.
Baumann, Gerhart. “Robert Musil, Eine Vorstudie.” Germanisch-Romantische Monatschrift 34 (1953): 292-316.
——. “Robert Musil, Die Struktur des Geistes oder der Geist der Struktur.” Germanisch-Romantische Monatschrift 41 (1960): 420-442.
——. Robert Musil: Zur Erkenntnis der Dichtung. Bern: Francke, 1965.
Bausinger, Hermann. Studien zu einer historisch-kritischen Ausgabe von Robert Musils Roman “DMoE.” Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1964.
Baxter, Charles. “The Escape from Irony: ‘Under the Volcano’ and the Aesthetics of Arson.” Novel 18 (Winter 1977): 114-126.
Benveniste, Emile. Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard, 1966 and 1977, 2 vols.
——. “Sémiologie de la lange.” Semiotica 1 (1969).
Berghahn, Wilfred. “Die essayistische Erzaehltechnik Robert Musils.” Diss. Bonn: 1956.
Bergson, Henri. Le Rire: Essai sur la signification du comique. Paris: P.U.F., 1940-1972.
Blakney, Raymond B. Meister Eckhart: A Modern Translation. New York: Harper and Row, 1941.
Blanchot, Maurice. Le Livre à venir. Paris: Gallimard, 1959.
Boehlich, Walter. “Kontroversen ueber den ‘MoE’.” Die Welt 22 (1963): 6ff.
——. “Untergang und Erloesung.” Akzente I (1954).
Booth, Wayne C. The Rhetoric of Fiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961.
——. The Rhetoric of Irony. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975.
Boucher, Maurice. “Ironie romantique.” Cahiers du Sud 41 (1937): 29-32.
Bové, Paul A. “Cleanth Brooks and Modern Irony: A Kierkegaardian Critique.” Boundary II 4, No. 3 (Spring 1976): 727-759.
Braun, Wilhelm. “Musil and the Pendulum of the Intellect.” Monatshefte fuer deutschen Unterricht 49 (1957): 109-119.
——. “Musil’s Siamese Twins.” Germanic Review 33 (1958): 41-52.
——. “Musil’s Erdensekretariat der Genauigkeituund Seele; a Clue to the Philosophy of the Hero of ‘DMoE’.” Monatshefte fuer deutsche Unterricht 46 (1954): 305-316.
Brelet, Georges. “L’Esthétique du discontinu dans la musique nouvelle.” In Musiques nouvelles. Paris: Klincksieck, 1968.
Brooks, Cleanth. “Irony as a Principle of Structure.” In Literary Opinion in America. Ed. Morton Dawen Zabel. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1949-1951, pp. 729-741, vol. II.
——. The Well Wrought Urn. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc., 1947.
Brosthaus, Herbert. “Struktur und Entwicklung des andere Zustands’ in Robert Musils ‘DMoE’.” Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift 39 (1965): 338-440.
Brush, S. G. B. “Mach and Atomism.” Synthese 18, 2/3 (April 1968): pp. 192-216.
Capek, Milic. “Ernst Mach’s Biological Theory of Knowledge.” Synthèse 18, 2/3 (April 1968): pp. 171-191.
——. The Philosophical Impact of Contemporary Physics. New York: Van Nostrand, 1961.
Chabrol, Claude, ed. Sémiotique narrative et textuelle. Paris: Larousse, 1973.
Cherry, Colin. On Human Communication. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1957-1966.
Chomsky, Noam. “Recent Contributions to the Theory of Innate Ideas.” In The Philosophy of Language. Ed. J. R. Searle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971, pp. 126ff.
Clough, Wilson O. “Irony: A French Approach.” Review of L’lronie, by Wladimir Jankélévitch. Sewanee Review 47, No. 2 (April-June 1939): 175-183.
Cohen, Jean. Structure du langage poetique. Paris: Flammarion, 1966.
——. “Théorie de la figure.” Communications 16 (1970): 3-25.
Cohen, Robert S. “Ernst Mach: Physics, Percept and the Philosophy of Science.” Synthese 18, No. 2/3 (April, 1968): 132-170.
Cohn, Dorrit. “Psyche and Space in Musil’s ‘Die Vollendung der Liebe’.” Germanic Studies, 154-168.
Cook, Albert. “Stendhal and the Discovery of Ironic Interplay.” Novel 9 (Fall 1975): 4-54.
Crane, R. S. “The Critical Monism of Cleanth Brooks.” In Critics and Criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1952.
Culler, Jonathan. Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1975.
Deleuze, Gilles. Présentation de Sacher Masoch. Paris: Union Générale d’Editions, 1967.
——. Nietzsche et la philosophie. Paris: P.U.F., 1973.
——. Rhizômes. Paris: Minuit, 1976.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. L’Anti-Oedipe. Paris: Minuit, 1976.
Derrida, Jacques. L’Ecriture et la différence. Paris: Seuil, 1967.
Dinklage, Karl, ed. Robert Musil, Leben, Werk, Wirkung. Vienna: Auftrage des Landes Kärnten und der Stadt Klagenfurt, 1960.
Dinklage, Karl, et al., ed. Robert Musil; Studien zu seinem Werk. Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1970. Vol. I-V.
“Le Discours ironique.” Proc. of a Conference on Ironic Discourse. July 23-29, 1979. Urbino: The International Center for Research in Semiotics, to appear.
Doeblin, Alfred. “Ueber Robert Musil.” In Aufsaetze zu Literatur. Olten: Walter, 1963.
Dolezel, Lubomeir. “A Scheme of Narrative Time.” In Semiotics of Art. Ed. Ladislav Matejka and Irwin Titunik. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1976, pp. 209ff.
Domic, René. “Les Inconvènients de l’ironie.” In La Vie, les moeurs. Paris: Librarie Académique Didier, 1895.
Duwe, Wilhelm. Ausdrucksformen deutscher Dichtung, vom Naturalismus bis zur Gegenwart, Eine Stilgeschichte der Moderne. Berlin: E. Schmidt, 1965, pp. 46-49.
Dyson, A. E. The Crazy Fabric. London: Macmillan, 1965.
Eco, Umberto. L’Oeuvre ouverte. Trans. C. Roux de Bezieux. Paris: Seuil, 1965.
——. La Structure absente. Trans. Uccio Esposito Torrigianis. Paris: Mercure de France, 1972.
——. A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1976.
Ehrmann, Jacques, ed. Structuralism. New York: Doubleday, 1970.
Empson, William. Seven Types of Ambiguity. London: Pelican, 1930.
Fachenheim, Emil. Metaphysics and History. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1961.
Fann, K. T. Peirce’s Theory of Abduction. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1970.
Finlay, Marike. “The Potential of Irony: From a Semiotics of Irony Towards an Epistemology of Communicational Praxis: Friedrich Schlegel and Robert Musil.” Diss., Université de Montréal, 1981.
——. “Semiotics or History: From content analysis to contextualized discursive praxis.” Semiotica 40, No. 3/4 (Fall/Winter 1982): 230-266.
——. “Pour une épistémologie de la communication: Au-delà de la représentation et vers la pratique.” Communication/Information, Vol. V, No. 2/3 (Hiver/Eté 1983).
——. “Perspectives of Irony and Irony of Perspectives: A Review.” The Canadian Journal of Research in Semiotics 5, No. 3 (Spring 1978): 3-51.
——. Powermatics: A Discursive Critique of New Communications Technology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1987.
——. The Romantic Irony of Semiotics: Friedrich Schlegel and the Crisis of Representation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1988.
Fischer, Ernst. “Das Werk Robert Musils.” Sinn und Form 9 (1957): 851-861.
Fontanier, Pierre. Les Figures du discours. Intr. Gérard Genette. Paris: Flammarion, 1977.
Foucault, Michel. L’Archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard, 1969.
——. Histoire de la folie. Paris: Union Générale d’Editions, 1961.
——. Les Mots et les choses. Paris: Gallimard, 1966.
——. L’Ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard, 1971.
Frier, Wolfgang. Die Sprache der Emotionalitaet in den “Verwirrungen des Zoeglings Toerless” von Robert Musil: Ein Beitrag zur angewandten Text-linguistik. Bonn: Bouvier, 1976.
Frye, Northrop. The Anatomy of Criticism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957.
Gans, Eric. “Hyperbole et ironie.” Poétique 24 (1975): 488-494.
Gardner, Martin. “Can Time Go Backward?” Scientific American 216 (January 1967): 98-108.
——. “On the Contradictions of Time Travel.” Scientific American 230 (May 1974): 120-213.
Genette, Gérard. Figures II. Paris: Seuil, 1969.
——. Figures III. Paris: Seuil, 1972.
——. “Frontières du récit.” Communications 8 (1966): 152-163.
——. Mimologiques: Voyage en Cratylie. Paris: Seuil, 1976.
——. “La Rhétorique restreinte.” Communications 16 (1970): 158-171.
Glicksberg, Charles I. The Ironic Vision in Modern Literature. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1969.
Gottschnigg, Dietmar. “Die Bedeutung der Formel ‘Mann ohne Eigenschaften’.” In Musil Studien. Ed. U. Bauer. Munich: Wlm. Fink, 1973. Vol. IV.
——. Mystische Tradition im Rome Robert Musils. Heidelberg: Stiehm, 1974.
Graf, Gunter. Studien zur Funktion des ersten Kapitels vom Robert Musils Roman “DMoE”: Ein Beitrag zur Unwahrhaftigkeits—Typik der Gestalten. Göppingen: Alfred Kummerle Verlag, 1969.
Greimas, Algirdas Julien. Du Sens. Paris: Seuil, 1970.
——. “L’Enonciation.” Signicaçao: Revista Brasileira de Semiotica 1 (1974): 1-26.
——. Essais de sémiotique poétique. Paris: Larousse, 1972.
——. Maupassant: La Sémiotique du texte. Paris: Seuil, 1976.
——. Sémantique structurale. Paris: Larousse, 1966.
——. Sémiotique et sciences sociales. Paris: Seuil, 1976.
Habermas, Juergen. Communication and the Evolution of Society. Trans. Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press, 1979.
——. Knowledge and Human Interests. Trans. Jeremy Shapiro. Boston: Beacon Press, 1968-71.
——. Legitimation Crisis. Trans. Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press, 1973-1975.
——. “Some Distinctions in Universal Pragmatics.” Theory and Society 3, No. 2 (Summer 1976): pp. 156-167.
——. Theory and Practice. Trans. John Viertel. Boston: Beacon Press, 1971-1973.
——. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, vol. I & II. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1981.
Habermas, Juergen, and Niklas Luhmann. Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1971.
Haidu, Peter. Aesthetic Distance in Chrétien de Troyes: Irony and Comedy in “Cliges” and “Perceval.” Geneva: Droz, 1968.
Hall, Stuart. “The Determinations of News Photographs,” in The Manufacture of News. Stanley Cohen and Jock Young. London: Constable, 1973. pp. 176-190.
Hallays, André. “L’Ironie.” Revue Politique et Littéraire 9, No. 17 (April 1898): 515-521.
Hamon, Philippe, ed. Poétique de récit. Paris: Seuil, 1977.
Hartzell, Richard, E. “The Three Approaches to the ‘Other State’ in Musil’s ‘MoE’.” Colloquia Germanica 10, No. 3 (1976-1977): 204-219.
Hass, Hans-Egon and Gustav-Adolf Mohrlueder, eds. Ironie als literarisches Phanomen. Koln: Kiepenheuer and Witsch, 1973.
Heelan, Patrick. Quantum Mechanics and Objectivity. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1965.
Heintel, Erich. “ ‘DMoE’ und die Tradition.” Wissenschaft und Weltbild 13 (1960): 179-194.
Herrenius. Rhetorica ad Herrenium. Ed. and trans. Harry Caplan. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard, 1954.
Hirsch, E. D., Jr. The Aims of Interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.
Hjelmslev, Louis. Prolègomènes à une théorie du langage. Trans. Una Canger. Paris: Minuit, 1968-1971.
Hochstaetter, Dietrich. Sprache des Moeglichen: Stilistischer Perspektivismus in Robert Musils “MoE.” Frankfurt: Athenaeum Verlag, 1972.
Hochstaetter, Dietrich, and Helmut Arntzen. Satirischer Stil. Zur Satire Robert Musils im Mann ohne Eigenschaften. Bonn: H. Bouvier u. Co. Verlag, 1970.
Hoehn, Gerhart. “Une Logique de la décomposition.” Esthétique I (1975): 97-139.
Hoffrichter, Werner. Studien zur erlebten Rede bei Thomas Mann und Robert Musil. Hague: Mouton and Co., 1965.
Holton, Gerald. “Mach, Einstein, and the Search for Reality.” Daedalus 97 (Spring 1968): 636-673.
Honig, Christoph. “Die Dialektik von Ironie und Utopie und Ihre Entwicklung Robert Musils Reflexionen: Ein Beitrag zur Deutung des Romans ‘DMoE’. Diss. Berlin: 1970.
Honold, Helga. “Die Funktion des Paradoxen bei Robert Musil, dargestellt am ‘MoE’.” Diss. Tuebingen: 1963.
Hooker, Ward. “Irony and Absurdity in the Avant-Garde Theatre.” Kenyon Review (Summer 1960): 436-454.
Horkheimer, Max. Critical Theory. Trans. John O’Connell. New York: Herder and Herder, 1972.
Hutchens, Eleanor N. “The Identification of Irony.” ELH 28 (December 1969): 352-363.
L’Ironie: Linguistique et sémiologie: Travaux du Centre de Recherches Linguistiques et Sémiologiques de L’Université de Lyon II 2 (1976).
Jaessel, Geroff. “Mathematik und Mystik in Robert Musils Roman ‘DMoE’: eine Untersuchung ueber das Weltbild Ulrichs.” Diss. Munich: 1963.
Jakobson, Roman. Essais de linguistique générale. Trans. Nicholas Ruwet. Paris: Minuit, 1963.
——. “Linguistics and Communication.” In Structure of Language and Its Mathematical Aspects. Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics 12 (1961): 247ff.
Janik, Allan, and Stephen Toulmin. Wittgenstein’s Vienna. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1973.
Jankélévitch, Vladimir. L’Ironie. Paris: Flammarion, 1964.
Jauss, Hans-Robert. Literaturgeschichte als Provokation. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1970.
——. “Zum Problem der Granzziehung zwischen dem Laecherlichen und dem Komischen,” and “Ueber den Grund des Vergnuegens am komischen Helden.” In Das Komische. Ed. W. Preisendanz and R. Warning. Muenchen: 1976, pp. 36-384 and 103-132.
Jay, Martin. The Dialectical Imagination. Boston: Little, Brown, 1973.
Kaiser, Ernst. “ ‘DMoE’, ein Problem der Wirklichkeit.” Merkur 11 (1957): 669-687.
Kaiser, Ernst, and Eithne Wilkins. Robert Musil, Eine Einfuehrung in das Werk. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer, 1962.
Kalow, Gert. “Robert Musil.” In Deutsche Literatur im 20. Jahrhundert, Strukturen und Gestalten. Ed. H. Frieckmann. Heidelberg: O. Mann, 1959. Vol. III., pp. 304-319.
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Norman Kemp Smith. London: Macmillan, 1963.
Karthaus, Ulrich. Der andere Zustand: Zeitstrukturen im Werke Robert Musils. Berlin: Eric Schmidt Verlag, 1965.
Keil, Heinrich, ed. Grammatici Latici. Leipzig: Treubner, 1875-1880, 5 vols.
Kemper, Claudette. “Irony: A New Approach with Occasional Reference to Byron and Browning.” Studies in English Literature 7 (1967): 709-719.
Kierkegaard, Soren. The Concept of Irony. Trans. Lee M. Capel. London: Harper and Row, 1956.
——. Concluding Unscientific Postscript. Trans. D. Swenson and Walter Lowrie. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1941-1971.
——. Either/Or. Trans. D. Swenson and L. Swenson, with revision by H. Johnson. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1944-1971.
Kimpel, Dieter. “ ‘Beitraege zur geistigen Bewaeltigung der Welt . . .’ Ueber den Romanbegriff Robert Musils.” In Deutsche Roman-theorie, Beitraege zu einer historischen Poetik des Romans in Deutschland. Ed. Reinhold Grimm. Frankfurt: Grimm, 1968, pp. 371-396.
Kortian, Garbis. Métacritique. Paris: Minuit, 1979.
Krieger, Murray. “An Apology for Poetics.” In Ira Konigsberg, ed. American Criticism in the Poststructuralist Age. Ed. Ira Konigsberg. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1981, pp, 87-101.
Kristeva, Julia. Polylogue. Paris: Seuil, 1977.
——. Semiotike: Recherches pour une sémanalyse. Paris: Seuil, 1969.
Krysinski, Wladimir. “Isotopie et dislocation des codes dans ‘Six personnages en quète d’auteur,’ de Luigi Pirandello.” Proc. of the First Congress of the International Association of Semiotics. Milan: 1974.
——. “Musil vs. Scarron ou l’indédetermination du romanesque.” Canadian Journal of Research in Semiotics. No. 1, 1981.
Kuehn, Dieter. Analogie und Variation: Zur Analyse von Robert Musils Roman “DMoE.” Bonn: B. v. Wiese, 1965.
Kuehne, Joerg. Das Gleichnis; Studien zur inneren Form von Robert Musils Roman, “DMoE.” Tuebingen: Niemeyer, 1968.
Lacan, Jacques. Ecrits. Paris: Seuil, 1966.
Lalande, André. Vocabulaire technique et critique de la philosophie. Paris: P.U.F., 1926-1976.
Lange, Victor. “Musils ‘Das Fliegenpapier’.” Colloquia Germanica 10, No. 3 (1976-77): 193-203.
Lausberg, Heinrich. Elemente der Literarischen Rhetorik. Munich: Hueber, 1963.
Lukac̀s, George. The Theory of the Novel: A Historico-Philosophical Essay on the Forms of Great Epic Literature. Trans. Anna Bostock. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1971-1975.
Lyotard, Jean-François. Dérivé à partir de Marx et de Freud. Paris: Union Générale d’Editions, 1973.
——. Des Dispositifs pulsionnels. Paris: Union Générale d’Editions, 1973.
Mach, Ernst. The Structure of Mechanics. Trans. T. J. McCormack, Lasalle, Ill.: Open Court, 1945, 5th ed.
Marin, Louis. La Critique du discours: sur la “Logique de ‘Port-Royal’ et les Pensées” de Pascal. Paris: Minuit, 1975.
——. Le récit est un piège. Paris: Minuit, 1978.
——. Utopiques: Jeux d’espaces. Paris: Minuit, 1978.
Metz, Christian. “La grande syntagmatique du film narratif.” Communications 8 (1966): 122-123.
Michel, Karl Markus. “Die Utopie der Sprache.” Akzente 1 (1954).
Monod, Jacques. Chance and Necessity. Trans. Austin Wainhous. New York: Vintage, 1972.
Morris, Charles. “Foundations of the Theory of Signs.” In Foundations of the Unity of Science Encyclopaedia 1, no. 2 Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1938.
Muecke, D. C. The Compass of Irony. London: Methuen, 1969.
——. Irony: The Critical Idiom. Fakenham: Methuen and Co., Ltd., 1970.
Mueller, Goetz. Ideologie Kritik und Metasprache. Munich: Wlm. Fink Verlag, 1972.
Mueller, Guenther, “Erzaehlzeit und erzaehlte Zeit.” Morphologische Poetik. Tubingen: 1948-1968.
Murillo, Louis Andrew. The Cyclical Night: Irony in James Joyce and Jorge Luis Borges. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1968.
Musil, Robert. Gesammelte Werke. Ed. Adolf Frisé. Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1978. Vols. I and II.
——. Der Mann ohne Eigenschaften. Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1957.
——. Prosa, Dramen, Spaete Briefe. Ed. Adolf Frisé. Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1952.
——. “Tagebuecher, Aphorismen, Essays und Reden.” In Gesammelte Werke, vol. II. Ed. Adolf Frisé. Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1955.
——. “Beitrag zur Beurteilung der lehren Machs.” Diss. Berlin: 1908.
——. The Man without Qualities. Trans. Eithne Wilkins and Ernst Kaiser. London: Seeker and Warburg, 1953-60.
——. Young Toerless. Trans. Eithne Wilkins and Ernst Kaiser. New York: Pantheon, 1955.
——. L’Homme sans qualités. Trans. Philippe Jaccottet. Paris: Seuil, 1957, 4 vols.
Nelson, Robert J. Play within a Play. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1958.
Neveux, Jean, B. “Robert Musil Jugendstil et Sezession.” Etudes Germaniques 4 (1968): 582-599.
Nietzsche, F. W. Gesammelte Werke. Leipzig: C. G. Neumann, 1900-1915, 19 vols.
Nuesser, Peter. Musils Romantheorie. The Hague: Mouton, 1967.
Ogden, Charles, and I. A. Richards. The Meaning of Meaning. New York: Harcourt Brace Inc., 1927.
Olshewsky, Thomas, ed. Problems in the Philosophy of Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1969.
Ortega Y Gasset, José. The Dehumanization of Art, and Other Essays on Art, Culture and Literature. Trans. Helene Weyl. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1948-1968.
——. Meditations on Quixote. Trans. Evelyn Rugg and Diego Marin. New York: W. W. Norton and Co., Inc., 1961-1963.
Palante, Georges. “L’Ironie: Étude psychologique.” Revue Philosophique 41 (Feb. 1906): 147-163.
Paulhan, François. La Morale de l’ironie. Paris: Librairie Félix Alcan, 1925.
Paz, Octavio. Children of the Mire: Modern Poetry from Romanticism to the Avant-Garde. Trans. Rachel Phillips. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1974.
Peirce, Charles S. Selected Writings: Values in a Universe of Chance. Ed. Philip P. Wiener. New York: Dover, 1958.
——. Collected Papers of C. S. Peirce. Ed. Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, (vols. 7 and 8 ed. Arthur Burks). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1931-58.
——. The Philosophy of Peirce: Selected Writings. Ed. Justus Buchler. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1940.
Pelc̀, Jerzy. “On the Concept of Narration.” Semiotica 1 (1971).
Peters, Friederich G. Robert Musil: Master of the Hovering Life. New York: Columbia University Press, 1978.
Piaget, Jean. Epistémologie des sciences de l’homme. Paris: Gallimard, 1970.
Pike, Burton. Robert Musil: An Introduction to his Work. New York: Cornell University Press, 1969.
Pirandello, Luigi. Choix d’essais. Ed. and trans. Georges Piroue. Paris: Denoel, 1960-1968.
Poétique: “Ironie,” 36, (novembre 1978).
Poggioli, Renato. The Theory of the Avant-Garde. Trans. Gerald Fitzgerald. New York: Harper and Row, 1968-1971.
Price, W. C. and Seymour S. Chessick, eds. The Uncertainty Principle and Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: A Fifty Year Survey. New York: Wiley, 1977.
Rasch, Wolfdieter. Ueber Musils Roman “DMoE.” Goettingen: Vandenhoeck u. Ruprecht, 1967.
——. “Zur Entstehung von Robert Musils Roman ‘DMoE’.” Deutsctie Viertel-jahrsschrift 39 (1965): 350-387.
Rastier, François. Essais de sémiotique discursive. Tours: Mame, 1974.
Reichenbach, Hans. The Direction of Time. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1956.
——. The Rise of Scientific Philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1962.
Reiss, Timothy J. “Archéologie du discours et critique épistémique: Project pour une critique discursive.” In Philosophie et Littérature. Ed. Pierre Gravel. Montréal: Bellarmin, 1979, pp. 143-189.
——. “Cartesian Discourse and Classical Ideology.” Diacritics (Winter 1976): 19-27.
——. “The Environment of Literature and the Imperatives of Criticism.” Manuscript.
——. “Peirce, Frege, la vérité, le tiers inclus et le champ pratiqué,” Langages (1980): 103-127.
——. “Semiology and its Discontents: Saussure and Greimas.” The Canadian Journal of Research in Semiotics 5, No. 1 (Fall 1977): 65-102.
——. “The Word/World Equation.” Yale French Studies No. 49 (1973): 1ff.
Ricoeur, Paul. La Métaphore vive. Paris: Seuil, 1975.
Rismondo, Piero. “Chiffrirschluessel fuer Musil.” Wort und Wahrheit I (1956): 292-294.
Robbe-Grillet, Alain. Pour un nouveau roman. Paris: Minuit, 1963.
Root, John J. “Stylistic Irony in Thomas Mann.” The Germanic Review 35, No. 2 (April 1960): 93-103.
Roth, Marie-Louise. Robert Musil, les oeuvres pré-posthumes. Paris: Recherches, 1980. 2 vols.
Salm, Peter, “Faust and Irony.” The Germanic Review 40, No. 3 (May 1965): 192-204.
Sarraute, Nathalie. L’Ere du soupçon. Paris: Gallimard, 1956.
de Saussure, Ferdinand. Cours de linguistique générale. Ed. T. de Mauro. Paris: Payot, 1975.
Savan, David. “An Introduction to C. S. Peirce’s Semiotics.” Toronto: The Toronto Semiotic Circle, 1976.
Schaerer, Rene. “Le Mécanisme de l’ironie dans ses rapports avec la dialectique.” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 48 (1941): 181-209.
Schlegel, Friedrich, Kritische Ausgabe. Ed. Hans Eichner, Ernst Behler, and Jean-Jacques Anstett. Munich: F. Schoeninhg, 1958- , 18 vols.
——. Litėrary Notebooks. Ed. Hans Eichner. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1957.
——. “Lucinde” and the “Fragments.” Trans, and intr. Peter Firchow. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1971.
Schoene, Albrecht. “Zum Gebrauch des Konjunktivs bei Robert Musil.” In Deutsche Romane von Grimmelshausen bis Musil. Ed. Jost Schillemeit. Frankfurt: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, 1966-74, pp. 290-318.
Scholes, Robert. Structuralism in Literature: An Introduction. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.
Schorske, Carl E. Fin-de-siècle Vienna. New York: Vintage Books, 1981.
Schramm, Ulf. Fiktion und Reflexion; Ueberlegungen zu Musil und Becket. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1967.
Sedgewick, G. G. Of Irony, Especially in Drama. Toronto: Macmillan, 1948.
Seidler, Inge. “Das Nietzschebild Robert Musils.” Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift 39 (1965): 329-349.
Sera, Manfred. Utopie und Parodie bei Musil, Broch, und Thomas Mann. Bonn: Bouvier Verlag, 1969.
Serres, Michel. “Exact and Human.” Substance 12 (1978): 10-19.
Shklovsky, Victor. “Sterne’s ‘Tristram Shandy’: Stylistic Commentary.” In Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays. Ed., trans, and intr. L. T. Lemon and M. J. Reis. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1965, pp. 25-60.
Silone, Ignazio. “Robert Musil und sein Werk fuer die Dichtung unsere Zeit.” Universitas 7 (1965): 699-706.
Skeat, W. Etymological Dictionary. New York: Capricorn Books, 1973.
Sokel, Walter, H. “Robert Musils Narrenspiegel.” Neue deutsche Hefte 7 (1960-61): 199-214.
Steger, Hugo. “Literatursprache und Wirklichkeit, Robert Musils Roman ‘DMoE’.” In Zwischen Sprache und Literatur; drei Reden. Goettingen: Grimm, 1967, vol. 9, pp. 70-108.
Stern, J. P. “Karl Kraus’ Vision of Language.” In Modern Language Review (January 1966): 73-74.
Strelka, Joseph. “Robert Musil, der Utopist eines anderen Lebens.” In Kafka, Musil, Broch und die Entwicklung des modernen Romans. Vienna: Rowohlt, 1959, pp. 36-64.
Suleiman, Susan. “Interpreting Ironies.” Review of A Rhetoric of Irony, by Wayne C. Booth. Diacritics (Summer 1976): 15-21.
Thoeming, Jürgen. Robert Musil—Bibliographie. Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1968.
Thompson, Alan R. The Dry Mock: A Study of Irony in Drama. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1948.
Todorov, Tzvetan, ed. and trans. Théorie de la littérature: Textes des formalistes russes. Paris: Seuil, 1965.
Tomashevsky, Boris. “Russian Thematics’.” In Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays. Ed., trans, and intr. L. T. Lemon and M. J. Reis. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1965, pp. 61-95.
Trommler, Frank. Roman und Wirklichkeit, Eine Ortsbestimmung am Beispiel vom Musil, Broch, Roth, Doderer und Gütersloh. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1966.
Wahl, Jean. Etudes Kierkegaardiennes. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1967.
Weinrich, Harald. Linguistik der Luege (kann Sprache die Gedanken verbergen?) Heidelberg: L. Schneider, 1966.
Wienbruch, Ulrich. “Das Universelle Experiment.” Diss. Köln: 1964.
Wiener, P. and F. Young, eds. Studies in the Philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1952.
Wilde, Alan. “Desire and Consciousness: The ‘Anironic’ Forster.” Novel 14 (Winter 1976): 114-129.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell, 1958-1974.
——. Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1921-1964.
Zumthor, Paul. Langue, texte, énigme. Paris: Seuil, 1975.
——. Essai de poétique médiévale. Paris: Seuil, 1972.
We use cookies to analyze our traffic. Please decide if you are willing to accept cookies from our website. You can change this setting anytime in Privacy Settings.